AI Protocols Analysis Report: A2A, MCP, and ACP

Introduction

• This report analyzes three emerging AI agent communication protocols that are shaping the future of AI systems integration: Model Context Protocol (MCP), Agent Communication Protocol (ACP), and Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A).
• These protocols represent different approaches to solving key challenges in AI agent interoperability, context management, and multi-agent coordination, with significant implications for AI engineers and system architects.

Part 1: Overview of AI Agent Protocols

The Emerging Standards Landscape

• The field of AI agent communication is rapidly evolving with three major protocols emerging from different organizations:

  • Model Context Protocol (MCP): Introduced by Anthropic
  • Agent Communication Protocol (ACP): Proposed by BeeAI and IBM
  • Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A): Developed by Google

• Each protocol addresses a distinct aspect of the AI agent ecosystem:

  • MCP focuses on providing structured context to language models
  • ACP enables local-first agent coordination
  • A2A facilitates cross-platform agent communication

Part 2: Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Core Functionalities

• Contextual Data Injection: MCP enables external resources (files, database rows, API responses) to be integrated directly into prompt or working memory through a standardized interface.
• Function Routing & Invocation: Allows models to dynamically call tools by registering capabilities like searchCustomerData or generateReport that can be invoked on demand.
• Prompt Orchestration: Facilitates modular, on-the-fly prompt construction for smarter context management with fewer tokens and better outputs.

Implementation Characteristics

• Operates over HTTP(S) with JSON-based capability descriptors
• Designed to be model-agnostic, compatible with any LLM with a compatible runtime
• Works with enterprise authentication standards (OAuth2, mTLS)

Engineering Use Cases

1. LLM integrations for internal APIs: Secure access to structured business data without exposing raw endpoints
2. Enterprise agents: Equipping autonomous agents with runtime context from tools like Salesforce, SAP, or internal knowledge bases
3. Dynamic prompt construction: Tailoring prompts based on user session, system state, or task pipeline logic

Part 3: Agent Communication Protocol (ACP)

Protocol Design & Architecture

• ACP defines a decentralized agent environment where:
  • Agents advertise their identity, capabilities, and state through a local broadcast/discovery layer
  • Communication occurs through event-driven messaging via local bus or IPC systems
  • Optional runtime controllers can orchestrate behavior, aggregate telemetry, and enforce policies

Implementation Characteristics

• Designed specifically for low-latency environments (robotics, offline edge AI)
• Can be implemented over gRPC, ZeroMQ, or custom runtime buses
• Emphasizes local sovereignty with no cloud dependency or external service registration
• Supports capability typing and semantic descriptors for automated task routing

Engineering Use Cases

1. Multi-agent orchestration on edge devices: Applications in drones, IoT clusters, or robotic fleets
2. Local-first LLM systems: Coordination of model invocations, sensor inputs, and action execution
3. Autonomous runtime environments: Enabling agent coordination without centralized cloud infrastructure

Part 4: Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A)

Protocol Overview

• A2A defines an HTTP-based communication model where agents function as interoperable services
• Each agent exposes an "Agent Card" - a machine-readable JSON descriptor detailing identity, capabilities, endpoints, and authentication requirements
• Currently specifies JSON-RPC 2.0 over HTTPS as its core interaction mechanism

Core Components

• Agent Cards: JSON documents describing capabilities, endpoints, message types, auth methods, and runtime metadata
• A2A Client/Server Interface: Agents can function as clients, servers, or both
• Message & Artifact Exchange: Support for multipart tasks, streaming output, and persistent artifacts
• User Experience Negotiation: Adaptation of message format and visualization to match downstream capabilities

Security Architecture

• OAuth 2.0 and API key-based authorization
• Capability-scoped endpoints exposing only required functions
• Support for "opaque" mode operation that hides internal logic while exposing callable services

Engineering Use Cases

1. Cross-platform agent ecosystems: Secure interoperation between agents from different teams or vendors
2. Distributed agent orchestration: Cloud-native AI environments (Vertex AI, LangChain, HuggingFace Agents)
3. Multi-agent collaboration frameworks: Enterprise AI workflows spanning multiple systems (CRM, HR, IT)

Part 5: Comparative Analysis and Integration Potential

Side-by-Side Comparison

Complementary Relationships

• MCP and A2A Integration: These protocols solve different parts of the agent AI ecosystem and can work together effectively:
  • "MCP connects AI to tools"
  • "A2A connects AI to other AI"

• ACP's Distinct Role: ACP takes a different approach focused on local-first coordination without cloud requirements, ideal for:
  • Limited bandwidth or low-latency requirements
  • Privacy-sensitive applications requiring offline operation
  • Deployment in internet-restricted environments

Future Outlook

• Convergence Scenario: A unified agent platform where A2A handles inter-agent communication, MCP manages tool/data access, and ACP-style runtimes support edge or offline scenarios
• Fragmentation Risk: Different vendors pushing proprietary protocol variations, creating integration challenges similar to early web services
• Middle Ground: Open-source tools and middleware could abstract differences and provide unified APIs while handling translation between protocols

Conclusion

• The AI agent protocol landscape is still in early development but shows promising approaches to solving different aspects of agent interoperability.
• MCP, ACP, and A2A each address distinct needs in the AI ecosystem and could potentially complement each other in comprehensive agent architectures.
• The future effectiveness of these protocols will depend on standardization efforts, open-source implementations, and industry adoption patterns.
• AI engineers should understand these protocols to make informed architectural decisions when designing multi-agent systems, considering factors like deployment environment, latency requirements, and integration needs.

Related Articles

• Understanding A2A Protocol - A detailed guide to the fundamentals of the A2A protocol
• A2A vs MCP: A Comprehensive Comparison - An in-depth comparison between A2A and MCP protocols
• Python A2A Tutorial with Source Code - Hands-on implementation guide for A2A protocol in Python
• A2A Sample Methods and JSON Responses - Reference guide for A2A protocol methods and response formats

Go A2A